Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Our dear diaries.

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Philosophe_rouge » Sun Jun 21, 2009 6:24 am

Losey-fest continued?

Image
Accident (Losey, 1967)

There is a huge disdain for "using" people in Losery's work, or perhaps it's something of a perverse fascination? Though often we see how class divisions create this sort of objectification of people on a lower social standing, on Accident, the tables are turned. Though still sitting comfortably as a financially comfortable professor, Stephen remains outside of aristocratic class. His student William though is from a long tradition of blue blood, and in this film is the exploited, as Stephen uses him exploits for his own pleasures and mindgames in Accident. This is perhaps the film that comes closest to reaching the extreme levels of The Servant in both it's mood and extreme approach. I almost want to call it a thriller, as two men compete intellectually and emotionally against each other, in a careless pursuit for individual superiority. Their spars are rarely, if ever, overt, but it's a constant competition intellectually, socially and sexually, to see who will rise above. It's fascinating as we watch Stephen's restrained and seemingly morally guided approach failing, only to have him take advantage of an extremely morally dubious situation to put himself ahead.

Image
The Go-Between (Losey, 1970)

Taking a rather unprecedented twist on a romance between a farmer and a woman of high class, Losey brings them both to the same level, which is neither noble, nor evil, in what could easily have been a high passioned forbidden love story. The film is told from the perspective of a naive child who sits beyond the class of the house he is staying at for the summer, at first he doesn't quite understand the differences, though his pride in refusing to admit his mothr could not afford to buy him many nice clothes shows hints already of social conditionment. Turning thirteen in a very short amount of time, the young boy is suddenly aware of new feelings and desires that by lack of knowledge and general adolescent confusion that he cannot quite grasp. By virtue of his soft spokenness and kindness, the boy becomes the mesenger between the two lovers, the willing player in their game. He doesn't quite understand what he is doing, and when he becomes aware that there is something at work beyond just a business arrangement, he is only met with more questions. His inquisition puts into perspective the nature of the love afair, which Losey seems to indict as a carnal thrist,motivated by greed and carelessness. The class difference sheds little light on the emotions and actions of the affair, which is approached largely with coldness. Losey has a particular approach to emotion, one of detachment and understatedness. There is no denying that the couple feels for each other, but if it's just sex or something beyond is not quite as clear. The final moments though, as we move several decades into the future, Christie's character recounts just how beautiful and pure their love was... but the audience onscreen and off, don't quite feel the same way.
Image
User avatar
Philosophe_rouge
Nuts to the squirrels!
 
Posts: 2682
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby james » Sun Jun 21, 2009 4:47 pm

my favorites after The Servant. man, he's so great...
User avatar
james
Steve "Two Phones" MacAbee
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:17 am
Location: Canadia

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Philosophe_rouge » Mon Jun 22, 2009 1:32 am

james wrote:my favorites after The Servant. man, he's so great...

YES, I love him. I'm taking short break from his work for at least a little while, but there are still many of his films I'm excited to get to. It's been a while since I've really run through so many of a director's films in such a short time, I like it.
Image
User avatar
Philosophe_rouge
Nuts to the squirrels!
 
Posts: 2682
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Jewellrunner » Mon Jun 22, 2009 12:36 pm

Hmm, I need to check out this Losey character.
ImageImageImage
User avatar
Jewellrunner

 
Posts: 4315
Joined: Fri Jul 20, 2007 1:26 pm
Location: Kansas City

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Philosophe_rouge » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:25 pm

Image
Whatever Works (Allen, 2009)

As far as I'm concerned, Allen has re-ignited a streak of good filmmaking with this film and last year's Vicky Christina Barcelona. Though not as good as last year's effort, the film benefits greatly from the abandonment of his muse Scarlett Johansson, whose meager talents often marred his attempts and writing. Evan Rachel Wood takes over as the young, though slightly less precautious, female lead. She is a not-so-well-eduated Souther girl who has run away from her home to live in NYC. She has nowhere to stay however, and begs the misanthropic "genius", Boris, to let her stay the night. I don't think there is a more appropriate replacement for Allen himself than Larry David, who really shines in this film. The movie has many laugh out loud moments, and emotionally seems to channel Allen's films of the 80s, like Hannah and her Sisters, reflecting the impermanence and chance of love. It's not one of his best efforts, but it's light and fun, and the cast is great.

8/10

Image
Georgy Girl (Silvio Narizzano, 1964)

Though somewhat abbrasive, this is a mostly likeable film about a chubby and rough around the edges 22 year old girl who goes from never being kissed, to being courted as a mistress by her parent's employer and having an adulterous affair with her roomate's husband. Lynn Redgrave stars as Georgy, creating a thrilling character who is at once incredibly timid as well as capable of shocking extroversion. However, even those moments are punctuated by a reserved and guarded body language that really translate Georgy's fears and concerns beautifully. It pains me to say that Alan Bates is the weak point in the cast, because though he has some wonderful moments drawn from his spontaneity, he is also quite distracting and sometimes over the top. I think the real "star" of this film though is Charlotte Rampling in one of her very first film roles. She plays the "villain" the careless, beautiful Meredith whose only pursuit in life is her own pleasure and comfort. She is sexy and cold, and steals levery scene she is in. The actual story is hit or miss, it doesn't hit all the right notes, but the film is entertaining enough to recommend.

7.5/10
Image
User avatar
Philosophe_rouge
Nuts to the squirrels!
 
Posts: 2682
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Simon M. » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:30 pm

Philosophe_rouge wrote:I don't think there is a more appropriate replacement for Allen himself than Larry David...


this seems SO true, and it's why I can't wait to see this, but I'm afraid I'm doomed to be disappointed because I'm gonna be instinctually looking for the Curb Your Enthusiasm-esque Larry David instead of the channeling-Woody-Allen Larry David, even though I've always been a Woody Allen fan. Still, this looks fun, very excited to see it *banana*
User avatar
Simon M.
The Cuddler Rapist
 
Posts: 10065
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 5:08 am
Location: NY

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby james » Thu Jun 25, 2009 7:41 pm

Vicky is totally bottom-of-the-barrel Allen for me, and from the trailers Larry David looks pretty lost in this...I'll be seeing it regardless though, perhaps this weekend...
User avatar
james
Steve "Two Phones" MacAbee
 
Posts: 6202
Joined: Sun Jan 13, 2008 10:17 am
Location: Canadia

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby InHuman » Thu Jun 25, 2009 8:54 pm

Rouge, I read several times here and on your blog that you have a very low tolerance for violence in movies. Why do you like horror then?
Image Image Image
User avatar
InHuman

 
Posts: 2816
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 12:10 pm

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Philosophe_rouge » Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:43 pm

InHuman wrote:Rouge, I read several times here and on your blog that you have a very low tolerance for violence in movies. Why do you like horror then?

For starters, I think most of my favourite horror films are rather low on violence. Sub-genres that are high on it, like slashers and "torture" films are often my least favourite and I rarely watch them. I find those in particular exploit violence for fun, and it becomes a game of high kill counts, which I find unnappealing and not very interesting.

That being said, I think horror is a genre that explores horror from a psychological standpoint that I find interesting. It examines the consequences on the individual and society, on a very personal and emotional level. Violence also often serves as an externalization of internal pains and fears, while a very literal interpretation of trauma, is also often cerebral and allegorical.

I do have a low tolerance for violence for personal reasons. I find it upsetting, but I think that's a rather appropriate response. I find, for the most part, films and filmmakrs who approach violence as fun, necessary and without serious conseuqnece pretty disgusting and reprehensible.

Furthermore, as I watch and write about films as a means of further understanding myself, I think exploring my fears as being essential. I see a good horror film as a kind of tangible dream, seperated from reality, exploring thoughts, fears, and desires that are diffiicult, if not impossible to express with words. It's detachment is an asset in my acceptance of violence, but also as a means of exploring something I find so horrendous on the emotional level that I experience it.

Also, ironically, as much as I find violence terrible, I'm fascinated by the body and how we handle it's decomposition. How very physical acts of destruction are often more psychological than we give them credit for. Most of us who aren't faced with pain and violence on a daily basis understand it purely from a thoughtful manner, removed from pain. It becomes an issue of our relationship with our own mortality, and our understanding of bodily functions and impermanance as they relate to how we perceive ourselves and the people around us.

My 20 Favourite Horror Films

20. Black Sunday (Bava, 1960)
19. Trouble Every Day (Denis, 2001)
18. The Bride of Frankenstein (Whale, 1935)
17. Psycho (Hitchcock, 1960)
16. The Silence of the Lambs (Demme, 1991)
15. Kill, Baby, Kill (Bava, 1966)
14. The Legend of Hell House (John Hough, 1973)
13. The Innocents (Jack Clayton, 1961)
12. Let the Right One In (Tomas Alfredson, 2008)
11. Nosferatu (Herzog, 1979)
10. The Curse of the Cat People (Wise & Fritsch, 1944)
9. The Exorcist (William Friedkin, 1973)
8. The Shining (Kubrick, 1980)
7. Suspiria (Argento, 1977)
6. Rosemary's Baby (Polanski, 1968)
5. Dawn of the Dead (Romero, 1978)
4. Don't Look Now (Roeg, 1973)
3. Possession (Zulawski, 1981)
2. Black Christmas (Clark, 1974)
1. The Birds (Hitchcock, 1963)
Image
User avatar
Philosophe_rouge
Nuts to the squirrels!
 
Posts: 2682
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Janne Frank's Diary » Thu Jun 25, 2009 9:48 pm

:wuv:
Intresseklubben antecknar
User avatar
Janne Frank's Diary
Pimp
 
Posts: 5652
Joined: Thu May 03, 2007 4:33 pm
Location: Swedeland

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby InHuman » Thu Jun 25, 2009 10:13 pm

I know your top 20 horror films, from RO ;) Thanks, that was an interesting reply. I'm practically the opposite. I don't like horror, not because it scares me, but because I often think it's pointless, particularly the supernatural kind. I'm seeing The Birds really soon though.
As for violence, I now know why you still haven't seen Once Upon A Time In America. I'll still recommend it, but I can understand why you would refuse to watch it. Personally, I'm pretty neutral towards it though I get your point.
Image Image Image
User avatar
InHuman

 
Posts: 2816
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 12:10 pm

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Simon M. » Thu Jun 25, 2009 11:27 pm

InHuman wrote:Rouge, I read several times here and on your blog that you have a very low tolerance for violence in movies. Why do you like horror then?


this question implies that you consider violence and horror to go hand-in-hand. Such a mindset would undoubtedly arise from today's so-called 'horror' like all these shit remakes and Saws and such that focuses on violence and squeamishness and gore rather then genuine scares. Torture porn. Rule # 1 of horror is that the focus must be on the dread of something awful happening, not the actual awful event. It should be all about the calm before the storm, about the ticking of the time bomb, not the exploding of the time bomb.

Your boy Hitchcock made up that rule, by the way.
User avatar
Simon M.
The Cuddler Rapist
 
Posts: 10065
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 5:08 am
Location: NY

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby warthog » Fri Jun 26, 2009 3:56 am

Yes, she refuses to watch once upon a time in america! REFUSES!
he looks like a big bag full of mashed up asshole
User avatar
warthog
Legend
 
Posts: 19968
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:32 am

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Will » Fri Jun 26, 2009 4:12 am

:lol:
User avatar
Will
Assman
 
Posts: 3809
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 9:22 pm
Location: Northridge, California

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby InHuman » Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:38 am

Trans-Olof-Express wrote:Yes, she refuses to watch once upon a time in america! REFUSES!

Maybe that's the wrong word, but you know what I mean ;)
Simon, I think you're right. *thumbsup*
Whoa, did I just say that? :shoot:
Image Image Image
User avatar
InHuman

 
Posts: 2816
Joined: Sat May 09, 2009 12:10 pm

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby warthog » Fri Jun 26, 2009 10:12 am

Once in a while you have to agree with Simon, it is indeed a very painful moment
he looks like a big bag full of mashed up asshole
User avatar
warthog
Legend
 
Posts: 19968
Joined: Sat Sep 29, 2007 12:32 am

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Will » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:12 pm

:lol:
User avatar
Will
Assman
 
Posts: 3809
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 9:22 pm
Location: Northridge, California

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Simon M. » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:15 pm

Trans-Olof-Express wrote:Once in a while you have to agree with Simon, it is indeed a very painful moment


yeah, imagine being me then, always having to agree with myself by default. No wonder I live in perpetual misery :shake:
User avatar
Simon M.
The Cuddler Rapist
 
Posts: 10065
Joined: Thu Jun 07, 2007 5:08 am
Location: NY

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Will » Fri Jun 26, 2009 7:34 pm

*cries*
User avatar
Will
Assman
 
Posts: 3809
Joined: Thu Jan 01, 2009 9:22 pm
Location: Northridge, California

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby wigwam » Fri Jun 26, 2009 9:43 pm

:lol:
Image
User avatar
wigwam
Pussy, King of the Pirates
 
Posts: 17021
Joined: Wed Nov 07, 2007 7:07 am
Location: The DC

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby roujin » Sun Jul 26, 2009 6:48 pm

Philosophe_rouge wrote:17 Again (Burr Steers, 2009)


Just saw this and I completely agree. It's really good.
User avatar
roujin

 
Posts: 2450
Joined: Fri May 23, 2008 9:43 pm
Location: acceptable in the 80s

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Philosophe_rouge » Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:49 am

roujin wrote:
Philosophe_rouge wrote:17 Again (Burr Steers, 2009)


Just saw this and I completely agree. It's really good.

I have right opinions.
Image
User avatar
Philosophe_rouge
Nuts to the squirrels!
 
Posts: 2682
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Philosophe_rouge » Thu Jul 30, 2009 12:55 am

Image
User avatar
Philosophe_rouge
Nuts to the squirrels!
 
Posts: 2682
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Philosophe_rouge » Sat Aug 08, 2009 9:47 pm

Gate of Flesh (Suzuki, 1964)
Image

Gate of Flesh has at the very least inspired me to watch more of Suzuki's films. It's pop art sensibilities; the vibrant colour schemes, larger than life attitudes and the stylized film techniques are right up my aesthetic alley, and I was quickly convinced that I was going to love the film. Though the film maintains and even enhences this style throughout, adding touches here and there that continued to thrill and excite me, I found the story lacking and began to lose interest at the half way point. Again, the pulpy sensabilities is really something I love, but I didn't think it was seedy enough to be frank... I think it's less the actual storyline, but it's presentation, I didn't quite feel the emotional and psyhological degradation of the female characters, even though their actions were changing. I still think I rather liked the film, even though it was ultimately dissapointing. I think I'll check out Story of a Prostitute next.

Thirst (Park, 2009)
Image

I'll preface by saying this is my first Park film, I haven't seen Oldboy or any of the Vengeance trilogy. My reaction to this film was pretty mixed, there are quite a few wonderful moments and great scenes, but they were too spread apart and most of the narrative was dull, or at least bogged down by uneven pacing and a lot of false endings/starts. So ultimately, nothing really comes together, and even though a scene here and there wowed me, it never was able to build any tonal or emotional momentum. I really did appreciate the film's sense of humour, which was wonderfully perverse and absurd, and it's handling of sex was equally fascinating and well done.
Image
User avatar
Philosophe_rouge
Nuts to the squirrels!
 
Posts: 2682
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:07 pm

Re: Rouge's Super Sparkly Film Journal Pt. 2

Postby Philosophe_rouge » Sun Aug 16, 2009 1:44 am

The Girl Who Knew Too Much (Mario Bava, 1963)
Image

A fun take on Hitchcock's brand of thriller, this is one of my favourite Bava films to date, though it lacks the gothic intrigue that I loved so much about Kill, Baby, Kill and Black Sunday. The cinematography is great and the girl was very pretty.

8/10

Ponyo (Miyazaki, 2009)
Image

The plot is slight, and the voice acting average, but I'm still absolutely charmed by the film's visual style. Though not necessarily as extravagant as some of his previous efforts, the soft watercolour look is stunning and the opening sequence ranks among the most extravagant moments in Miyazaki's visual oeuvre. I look forward to seeing it with the original Japanese dub, to see if I enjoy it more.

7/10

Julie & Julia (Nora Ephron, 2009)

http://houseofmirthandmovies.wordpress. ... ulia-2009/

6.5/10

Strange Circus (Sion Sono, 2005)
Image

An interesting take on subjectivity, guilt and identity, this is one of Sono's strangest ventures. It begins as an expressionistic story of a young girl's incestuous relationship with her father, and the abuse she suffered from her mother. It's poetic and artful, but painfully artificial... it's all revealed to be the figment of a deranged popular erotic author, who may or may not be delving into her own disturbed (and forgotten) past. The film is absurd, disturbing and hilarious.

9/10

Adam (Max Mayer, 2009)
Image

Had some potential, but ends up falling flat in every respect. Just bland.

5.5/10

Bonjour Tristesse (Otto Preminger, 1958)
Image

It's only in the final half hour that this film truly won me over. As Cecile and Raymond's childishness and self-absorption reaches their true heights, we watch as they destroy the sensitive Anne, because of their own greed. One cannot truly blame Cecile, she is truly a child and has never been presented with an alternative to carelessness. It's at this point in the film, that everything else that preceeds it falls into place, and is suddenly skewed with a new lens. It's an interesting tonal choice, and one that is more or less successful.

8/10

The Cove (Louie Psihoyos, 2009)
Image

I'm a sucker for a good documentary, and this one got to me. The Cove is an extremely effective and persuasive documentary on the slaughter of dolphins in Taijii, Japan. Ric O’Barry stands at the center of the film, as both the man who began the world's passion for Dolphins, as well as the one who has sought to free all captive ones. What changed his mind, was what he describes as the suicide of Cathy, the primary dolphin who played Flipper in the television series. It was that moment that turned him around, made him realise the real crime of keeping animals that are so self-aware in captivity, and his quest began. The film presents it's arguments on how not only dolphins are extremely intelligent and self-aware, but the very real danger of consumming their meat, which was being given away in schools in Taijii. The film doesn't hold anything back in terms of revealing the true nature of what happens in the Cove, and it's easy to understand why the fisherman and municipal governemtn worked so hard to keep people away. Hopefully this film truly helps it's cause, because it's obviously something that needs to be changed. There is one particular shot of footage from the actual slaughter, that is one of the most affecting I've seen in cinema. One of the cameras has been placed underwater in the cove, and we watch as the water becomes a little cloudy, before quickly turning into an almost blinding red, as the whole bay fills with the blood of the dying dolphins.

9/10
Image
User avatar
Philosophe_rouge
Nuts to the squirrels!
 
Posts: 2682
Joined: Wed Jun 06, 2007 9:07 pm

PreviousNext

Return to Film Journals

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 1 guest